Aof unconstitutionality the Court observes that in its reasoning it is claimed that by Law no. approving the Government Emergency Ordinance no. regarding the initiation of the insolvency procedure at the DrobetaTurnu Severin Autonomous Directorate for Nuclear Activities a discriminatory treatment is created between the creditors of the DrobetaTurnu Severin Autonomous Directorate for Nuclear Activities and other creditors of other autonomous authorities at the national level as a result of the creation of the possibility of reduction nonpayment of their claims and the creditors of other autonomous kings have their claim rights intact. In this context the.


Court notes that the author of the exception Country Email List of unconstitutionality substantiates her criticisms of the normative act in question mainly by invoking certain principled solutions retained in the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court which she considers applicable in the present case appreciating that granting a privileged position to the right to claim of persons contravening art. para. in its component related to the prohibition of privileges related to art. para. of the Constitution regarding the thesis regarding the equal guarantee and protection of the right to private property. . The Court notes that the Autonomous Directorate for Nuclear Activities was established by.




Government Decision no. regarding the establishment of the Society Nuclearelectrica SA and the Autonomous Directorate for Nuclear Activities through the reorganization of the Autonomous Electricity Directorate Renel published in the Official Gazette of Romania Part I no. of July decision that was adopted pursuant to Government Emergency Ordinance no. regarding the reorganization of the autonomous regions published in the Official Gazette of Romania Part I no. of June approved with amendments by Law no. published in the Official Gazette of Romania Part I no. of December . Thus according to art. of.